AMD RDNA 4 GPU Memory and Infinity Cache Configurations Surface (2024)

Tomorrow said:

So coming 18% below 4090 with a card that costs only 60% as much is failing miserably now?
I have a feeling that even if AMD were faster and cheaper you'd make up some crap about their "faults".

Yes 4GB was too little. That being said 980 Ti was 6GB. Not exactly earth shattering capacity there either. I guess at that point it was deemed enough.
900 series were good cards. They improved over 700 series on the same node. Unfortunately this was also the last gen they allowed BIOS editing. After this they locked it down.

Oh i will wait and see, believe me. AMD current cards can do RT as well as 3090 Ti. So you're effectively telling me that 3090 Ti can't do RT.
AMD even does RT on consoles. Something i thought was impossible so soon in this generation on that hardware.
Like i proved earlier their FG is pretty good. It's you who keeps on denying reality. Yes the upscaling part is not as good but as we've proved already it does not matter how good it is. As an Nvidia fanboy you cant accept that anyone but Nvidia can be competent or make a competitive product.

Show me one AMD card that actually reaches it. TPU's latest review of 7900 XTX clearly shows that most cards reach around 80c: https://www.techpowerup.com/review/xfx-radeon-rx-7900-xtx-magnetic-air/37.html
All GPU's and CPU have max temp limits near 100c or higher. As do capacitors and VRM's - even higher. You using this as some sort of "own" against AMD shows you have zero clue what that number actually represents and that in real world no one actually reaches it.

The age old "AMD hotter/much power" myth refuses to die because dimwits like you dont bother reading a couple of reviews.
4090 hotspot ~75c.
7900 XTX hotspot ~80c.
Both well withing air cooling limits. As for power - 360W. 4090 uses over 400W. Even 4080S uses over 300W.
Again both are acceptable for high end cards. It's Nvidia who has a 600W BIOS for 4090 and was planning (subsequently canceled) a massive cinder block cooler for it's 600W+ monstrosity. But AMD uses 360W - oh noes.

Ah yes. The one using actual, factual sources for it's arguments is the fanboy but the one spewing nonsensical, laughable arguments is not. Sure, sure.

I have already exposed multiple of your lies here in this thread. You seem to be well short of "facts" to prove your fanboyish comments here.
Just ten year old BS arguments that have since been mostly resolved.

And you dont see the hypocrisy in this statement? You say AMD is hot, power hungry, that it's drivers are bad etc and then you bring up ATI, who was way worse in those areas. Shows you have zero clue about history.

Wrong again. Especially idle power is higher on all MCM designs due to the need to spend energy to move data around between dies.
And like was said before - MCM is absolutely about making smaller dies and lower defect rates.

Click to expand...

7900XTX don't do RT as well as 3090 Ti LMAO and Path Tracing completely destroys 7900XTX.

You sound like a true fanboy, with 500 dollars ready to buy RDNA4 on release.

Sadly it will be another joke release from AMD.

Nothing from AMD will be worth buying till maybe RDNA5, completely new arch, on 3nm or better in late 2025 or early 2026.

RDNA4 is nothing but RDNA3 refined with slightly better RT performance. No-one really cares.